Skip to main content
Vision-Language Benchmarks
MMMU — Massive Multidiscipline Multimodal Understanding
- arXiv: 2311.16502
- Size: 11,500 questions with images across 30 disciplines
- Format: Multiple choice; requires understanding image + text together
- Domains: Arts, sciences, medicine, engineering, humanities
- SOTA (2026): GPT-5: 82%, Gemini 3 Pro: 79%
MMMU-Pro
- arXiv: 2409.02813
- Improvement: 10 options (not 4); more complex problems; OCR required
- Less saturated: Top models ~60%
MMBench
- arXiv: 2307.06281 (Shanghai AI Lab, 2023)
- Size: 3,000 questions across 20 visual skills
- Skills: Object attributes, spatial relation, comparative reasoning, etc.
- Versions: English, Chinese, Dev/Test
VQAv2
- Source: VQA v2.0 (2017)
- Format: Open-ended questions about COCO images
- Size: 1.1M questions, 265K images
- Status: Saturated — top models score 85%+
- Replacement: MMMU, MMStar
DocVQA
- arXiv: 2007.00398
- Focus: QA over documents (PDFs, scans, forms)
- Size: 50,000 questions across 12,767 documents
- SOTA: 94%+ (Gemini 2.5 Pro, GPT-5)
ChartQA
- arXiv: 2203.10244
- Focus: Reasoning over graphs and charts
- Size: 9,608 questions across 4,804 charts
- Requires: OCR + quantitative reasoning
OCRBench
- arXiv: 2305.07895
- Focus: OCR capability of VLM models
- Includes: Text, tables, mathematical formulas, historical documents
ScienceQA
- arXiv: 2209.09513
- Format: Multimodal QA in sciences (elementary/middle school)
- Multimodal: Images + text; explainability (CoT)
MMStar
- arXiv: 2403.20330
- Focus: Eliminate "language leakage" — questions that can be answered without seeing the image
- More rigorous: Requires genuine vision
Video Benchmarks
Video-MME
- arXiv: 2405.21075
- Size: 2,700 videos from 30s to 1h
- Subtasks: Visual perception, temporal reasoning, OCR in video
- SOTA: Gemini 2.5 Pro (native video); GPT-5
MVBench
- arXiv: 2311.17005
- Focus: 20 video understanding tasks
Scientific Benchmarks
MedQA (USMLE)
- arXiv: 2009.13081
- Format: Questions from the American medical exam (USMLE Step 1–3)
- Size: 12,723 questions in English
- Human threshold: ~60% to pass
- SOTA: GPT-5, Claude Opus 4.7: 90%+ (surpasses doctors)
PubMedQA
- arXiv: 1909.06146
- Format: Answer yesnomaybe based on PubMed abstracts
- Size: 1,000 questions annotated by experts
MedBench
- arXiv: 2023.xxxxx
- Language: Chinese; traditional + Western medicine
- Benchmark: For healthcare models in the Asian context
LegalBench
- arXiv: 2308.11462 (Stanford, 2023)
- Size: 162 legal tasks; 40,000+ examples
- Includes: IRAC reasoning, statutory interpretation, contract analysis
- Skills: Issue spotting, rule recall, analysis, conclusion
FinanceBench
- arXiv: 2311.11944
- Format: QA over real financial documents (10-K, 10-Q, earnings)
- Size: 150 high-precision questions
LMSYS Chatbot Arena / LMArena
- URL: lmarena.ai
- Methodology: Blind votes from real users; Bradley-Terry Elo
- Dimensions: Multiturn, coding, math, vision, multilingual, hard prompts
Open LLM Leaderboard v2 (HuggingFace)
- URL: huggingface.cospacesopen-llm-leaderboard/openllmleaderboard
- Benchmarks: MMLU-Pro, BBH, GPQA, MUSR, MATH-lvl5, IFEval
- Focus: Open-source models
HELM (Stanford)
- URL: crfm.stanford.edu/helm
- Focus: Holistic evaluation — multiple metrics (accuracy, robustness, fairness, efficiency)
AlpacaEval 2.0
- Methodology: LLM-as-Judge with Claude Sonnet as judge
- Metric: Win rate vs GPT-4 Turbo
- Use: Evaluation of instruction/chat models
Arena-Hard
- Methodology: 500 hard prompts from Chatbot Arena; GPT-4o as judge
- Correlates well with real human preferences
State-of-the-Art Table for Multimodal Benchmarks (April 2026)
| Benchmark |
SOTA |
Model |
| MMMU |
82.1% |
GPT-5 |
| DocVQA |
95.4% |
Gemini 2.5 Pro |
| ChartQA |
92.3% |
Claude Opus 4.7 |
| MedQA (USMLE) |
93.7% |
GPT-5 |
| LegalBench (avg) |
72.4% |
Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Video-MME |
88.3% |
Gemini 3 Deep Think |