Multimodal and Scientific Benchmarks

Vision-Language Benchmarks

MMMU — Massive Multidiscipline Multimodal Understanding

  • arXiv: 2311.16502
  • Size: 11,500 questions with images across 30 disciplines
  • Format: Multiple choice; requires understanding image + text together
  • Domains: Arts, sciences, medicine, engineering, humanities
  • SOTA (2026): GPT-5: 82%, Gemini 3 Pro: 79%

MMMU-Pro

  • arXiv: 2409.02813
  • Improvement: 10 options (not 4); more complex problems; OCR required
  • Less saturated: Top models ~60%

MMBench

  • arXiv: 2307.06281 (Shanghai AI Lab, 2023)
  • Size: 3,000 questions across 20 visual skills
  • Skills: Object attributes, spatial relation, comparative reasoning, etc.
  • Versions: English, Chinese, Dev/Test

VQAv2

  • Source: VQA v2.0 (2017)
  • Format: Open-ended questions about COCO images
  • Size: 1.1M questions, 265K images
  • Status: Saturated — top models score 85%+
  • Replacement: MMMU, MMStar

DocVQA

  • arXiv: 2007.00398
  • Focus: QA over documents (PDFs, scans, forms)
  • Size: 50,000 questions across 12,767 documents
  • SOTA: 94%+ (Gemini 2.5 Pro, GPT-5)

ChartQA

  • arXiv: 2203.10244
  • Focus: Reasoning over graphs and charts
  • Size: 9,608 questions across 4,804 charts
  • Requires: OCR + quantitative reasoning

OCRBench

  • arXiv: 2305.07895
  • Focus: OCR capability of VLM models
  • Includes: Text, tables, mathematical formulas, historical documents

ScienceQA

  • arXiv: 2209.09513
  • Format: Multimodal QA in sciences (elementary/middle school)
  • Multimodal: Images + text; explainability (CoT)

MMStar

  • arXiv: 2403.20330
  • Focus: Eliminate "language leakage" — questions that can be answered without seeing the image
  • More rigorous: Requires genuine vision

Video Benchmarks

Video-MME

  • arXiv: 2405.21075
  • Size: 2,700 videos from 30s to 1h
  • Subtasks: Visual perception, temporal reasoning, OCR in video
  • SOTA: Gemini 2.5 Pro (native video); GPT-5

MVBench

  • arXiv: 2311.17005
  • Focus: 20 video understanding tasks

Scientific Benchmarks

MedQA (USMLE)

  • arXiv: 2009.13081
  • Format: Questions from the American medical exam (USMLE Step 1–3)
  • Size: 12,723 questions in English
  • Human threshold: ~60% to pass
  • SOTA: GPT-5, Claude Opus 4.7: 90%+ (surpasses doctors)

PubMedQA

  • arXiv: 1909.06146
  • Format: Answer yesnomaybe based on PubMed abstracts
  • Size: 1,000 questions annotated by experts

MedBench

  • arXiv: 2023.xxxxx
  • Language: Chinese; traditional + Western medicine
  • Benchmark: For healthcare models in the Asian context

LegalBench

  • arXiv: 2308.11462 (Stanford, 2023)
  • Size: 162 legal tasks; 40,000+ examples
  • Includes: IRAC reasoning, statutory interpretation, contract analysis
  • Skills: Issue spotting, rule recall, analysis, conclusion

FinanceBench

  • arXiv: 2311.11944
  • Format: QA over real financial documents (10-K, 10-Q, earnings)
  • Size: 150 high-precision questions

Leaderboard Platforms

LMSYS Chatbot Arena / LMArena

  • URL: lmarena.ai
  • Methodology: Blind votes from real users; Bradley-Terry Elo
  • Dimensions: Multiturn, coding, math, vision, multilingual, hard prompts

Open LLM Leaderboard v2 (HuggingFace)

  • URL: huggingface.cospacesopen-llm-leaderboard/openllmleaderboard
  • Benchmarks: MMLU-Pro, BBH, GPQA, MUSR, MATH-lvl5, IFEval
  • Focus: Open-source models

HELM (Stanford)

  • URL: crfm.stanford.edu/helm
  • Focus: Holistic evaluation — multiple metrics (accuracy, robustness, fairness, efficiency)

AlpacaEval 2.0

  • Methodology: LLM-as-Judge with Claude Sonnet as judge
  • Metric: Win rate vs GPT-4 Turbo
  • Use: Evaluation of instruction/chat models

Arena-Hard

  • Methodology: 500 hard prompts from Chatbot Arena; GPT-4o as judge
  • Correlates well with real human preferences

State-of-the-Art Table for Multimodal Benchmarks (April 2026)

Benchmark SOTA Model
MMMU 82.1% GPT-5
DocVQA 95.4% Gemini 2.5 Pro
ChartQA 92.3% Claude Opus 4.7
MedQA (USMLE) 93.7% GPT-5
LegalBench (avg) 72.4% Claude Opus 4.7
Video-MME 88.3% Gemini 3 Deep Think